Why One Marijuana Company Withdrew Its Federal Lawsuit On Interstate Commerce: Constitutional Clause Doesn’t Apply To Weed

Jefferson Packing House, an Oregon-based cannabis distribution company, has retracted its federal lawsuit challenging the state’s ban on the interstate trade of marijuana.

Launched in late 2022, Jefferson Packing House’s legal action targeted Oregon’s prohibition on the export of cannabis products across state borders.

The company’s argument centered around a dormant commerce clause of the U.S. Constitution, suggesting that the state law unfairly discriminates against interstate commerce.

Constitutional Debate And State Laws

The core of the lawsuit revolved around a constitutional debate, highlighting the tension between state and federal laws in the context of the cannabis industry.

Oregon is among several states that have prepared for the possibility of interstate cannabis trade, contingent on changes in federal law. Yet, this readiness contrasts with the state’s current stance against such commerce.

Withdrawal And Judicial Precedents

With legal proceedings poised to advance, the case took a surprising turn when Jefferson Packing House’s attorney, Andrew DeWeese, withdrew the lawsuit just before the scheduled hearing.

This decision followed a relevant ruling in Washington state, where a judge determined that the dormant commerce clause did not apply to cannabis, given its federal legal status.

Future Outlook

Despite the withdrawal, MJBizDaily reported DeWeese expressed ongoing concerns about the constitutionality of bans on interstate cannabis commerce.

He alluded to potential future actions and broader shifts in federal cannabis policy under the Biden administration, which could redefine the legal landscape for interstate cannabis trade.

Photo: AI-Generated Image.